Lansweeper is rated 8.6, while Spiceworks is rated 6.2. Lansweeper is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews while Spiceworks is ranked 12th in IT Asset Management with 4 reviews. There is an agent option, but to me, as a small business, the preference is to avoid agents where possible because you probably don't have the staff to keep up with them all." "We've found the most value right now in the inventory of the equipment."
The best part about it is that, when you have issues in getting information back from nodes, it tells you what the issue is, and you can quickly go to the specific nodes and respond to or repair those. It makes it easier for someone who is a consumer, but not necessarily a power user, to quickly create and run reports, get updates, and know what tasks need to be performed." "Provides good reports from every asset." "Its functionality is very solid. The reporting scripts that are continually posted are a real benefit. Especially for a small or medium business, it is a tremendous product." "It is very flexible and very powerful.
Obviously, it still requires credentials, but being agentless makes it much easier to deploy, especially for a small business. "A great value is the fact that it supports multiple platforms, and it is agentless.
0 kommentar(er)
